Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Fragility Curve Estimation× | Todennäköisyyspohjainen seismisen vaaran analyysi (PSHA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Disaster Studies | Rakennustekniikka |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2015 | 1968 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Jack W. Baker; Tiziana Rossetto & Amr Elnashai | C. Allin Cornell |
| Tyyppi≠ | Statistical estimation pipeline for conditional damage probability | Quantitative probabilistic framework |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579-599. DOI ↗ | Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5), 1583–1606. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Seismic Fragility Functions, Fragility Function Fitting, Conditional Damage Probability Curves, Lognormal Fragility Modeling | PSHA, seismic hazard analysis, probabilistic earthquake hazard assessment, Cornell-McGuire method |
| Liittyvät≠ | 4 | 1 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Fragility curve estimation produces a function that gives the probability that an asset reaches or exceeds a defined damage state as a function of a hazard intensity measure, such as peak ground acceleration or spectral acceleration. It is the central conditional-probability link in disaster risk assessment, sitting between hazard (how strong the shaking is) and loss (what the damage costs), and is almost always parameterized as a lognormal cumulative distribution defined by a median intensity and a logarithmic standard deviation. Tiziana Rossetto and Amr Elnashai's 2003 work derived empirical fragility and vulnerability functions for European reinforced-concrete buildings from large post-earthquake damage databases, while Jack Baker's 2015 paper formalized efficient maximum-likelihood fitting of fragility functions from dynamic structural analyses. The method spans empirical fitting to observed damage, analytical fitting to simulated response, and expert-based judgment when data are scarce. Its output, a small set of curves indexed by damage state, is the reusable vulnerability building block consumed by loss-estimation and catastrophe-modeling pipelines. Estimating these curves well is what makes downstream risk numbers credible rather than arbitrary. | Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) is a quantitative engineering framework used in civil and geotechnical engineering to estimate the likelihood that ground shaking will exceed a specified intensity level at a site within a given time window. By combining earthquake source geometry, recurrence statistics, and ground-motion attenuation models, PSHA produces hazard curves and maps that inform seismic design codes, infrastructure planning, and risk management decisions. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|