Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Kenttäpohjainen mukavuusotanta× | harkinnanvarainen otanta – kriteereihin perustuva tapausten valinta× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia | Kyselytutkimuksen metodologia |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | Mid-20th century onward | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Conventional practice in social and epidemiological field research | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Tyyppi≠ | Non-probability sampling | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-0495598428 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | intercept sampling, on-site convenience sampling, street intercept sampling, field intercept survey | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Liittyvät | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Field-based convenience sampling is a non-probability technique in which researchers recruit participants by approaching whoever is physically present and accessible at a chosen real-world location — a market, hospital waiting room, park, or transit hub. It is widely used in public health surveillance, marketing research, and exploratory social surveys when rapid, low-cost data collection is needed and probability sampling is not feasible. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|