Vertaile menetelmiä

	Kenttäpohjainen konstruktivistinen maadoitettu teoria	Konstruktivistinen ankkuroitu teoria – Charmaz
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	2000s (Charmaz 2006; fully articulated by 2014)	2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
Kehittäjä	Kathy Charmaz (constructivist variant); fieldwork orientation drawn from symbolic interactionist tradition	Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
Tyyppi	Qualitative research design and analytic approach	Qualitative research method
Alkuperäislähde	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Rinnakkaisnimet	field-based CGT, constructivist GT with fieldwork, situated grounded theory, Charmaz-field grounded theory	CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Liittyvät	5	6
Tiivistelmä	Field-based constructivist grounded theory integrates Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with active fieldwork in natural settings. Rather than relying solely on retrospective interviews, the researcher enters the participants' world — observing, interacting, and collecting data where social processes unfold — while simultaneously coding and building theory. The result is a grounded substantive theory that is both empirically anchored in real contexts and epistemologically co-constructed between researcher and participants.	Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.