Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Kenttätutkimukseen perustuva tapaustutkimus× | Osallistuva havainnointi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadullinen tutkimus |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1970s–1990s (formalized by Yin 1984, Stake 1995) | 1922 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert Yin, Robert Stake (case study formalization); field-based tradition rooted in anthropological and sociological fieldwork | Bronislaw Malinowski |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | fieldwork case study, naturalistic case study, in-situ case study, field case study | ethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | A field-based case study is a qualitative research design that investigates a bounded phenomenon — a case — within its real-world, natural setting through sustained on-site data collection. Combining the analytical structure of case study methodology with the direct observational immersion of fieldwork, it enables rich, context-sensitive understanding of how phenomena unfold in practice. The approach is firmly grounded in the frameworks of Robert Yin and Robert Stake and draws on anthropological traditions of participant and non-participant observation. | Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|