Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Selitettävä NMF-aihemalli× | Selitettävä BERT-pohjainen luokittelu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Syväoppiminen | Syväoppiminen |
| Menetelmäperhe | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2001 (NMF); XAI integration ~2017–present | 2019–2020 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. (NMF); XAI layer attributed to community practice post-2016 | Devlin et al. (BERT); explainability methods by Lundberg & Lee (SHAP), Ribeiro et al. (LIME), Sundararajan et al. (Integrated Gradients) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Interpretable unsupervised topic model | Pre-trained transformer classifier with post-hoc or intrinsic explainability |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (2001). Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 556–562. link ↗ | Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, pp. 4171–4186. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | XAI-NMF, interpretable NMF topic model, explainable NMF, transparent NMF topic modeling | XAI-BERT, interpretable BERT classifier, BERT with post-hoc explanation, transparent BERT classification |
| Liittyvät | 6 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | An Explainable NMF Topic Model combines Non-negative Matrix Factorization — a parts-based decomposition of a document-term matrix — with explicit interpretability techniques such as coherence metrics, word contribution scores, and SHAP-style attribution to make discovered topics transparent and auditable by human readers. | Explainable BERT-based Classification combines the predictive power of fine-tuned BERT transformers for text classification with post-hoc or intrinsic explainability techniques — such as SHAP, LIME, attention analysis, or integrated gradients — to reveal which words or tokens drove each prediction. The result is a classifier that is both accurate and interpretable enough for high-stakes or auditable NLP applications. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|