ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Ohjelmanarviointiin suuntautunut pragmaattinen monimenetelmäinen tutkimus×Ohjelman arviointi×
TieteenalaTutkimusasetelmaKenttämenetelmät
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi1990s–2000s1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
KehittäjäJennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles TeddlieMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
TyyppiMixed methods research designApplied evaluation methodology
AlkuperäislähdeGreene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Rinnakkaisnimetpragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluationevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Liittyvät23
TiivistelmäEvaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Download slides

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Evaluation-oriented Pragmatic Mixed Methods · Program Evaluation. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare