Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Arviointisuuntautunut yhdistelmämenetelmien matriisi× | Sekamenetelmien matriisi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tutkimusasetelma | Tutkimusasetelma |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2000s (Teddlie & Tashakkori 2009; Greene 2007) | 2003–2010 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Teddlie & Tashakkori (matrix framework); Greene (evaluation-oriented framing) | Tashakkori & Teddlie; Onwuegbuzie & Teddlie |
| Tyyppi≠ | Mixed methods design variant | Research design classification and planning tool |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 | Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Sage. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | evaluation MMM, mixed methods display matrix for evaluation, evaluation-focused methods matrix, program evaluation mixed methods matrix | MMR matrix, mixed-methods design matrix, research design classification matrix, mixed methods typology matrix |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The evaluation-oriented mixed methods matrix is a structured planning and display tool applied within program evaluation contexts. It maps evaluation questions against data sources, timing, and method types — quantitative and qualitative — in a grid format, making the integration logic explicit and auditable. Rooted in Greene's value-engaged mixed methods tradition and Teddlie and Tashakkori's matrix framework, it serves evaluators who must justify methodological choices to stakeholders while addressing multiple evaluation purposes simultaneously. | The mixed methods matrix is a systematic framework for classifying, planning, and comparing mixed methods research designs along key dimensions such as timing (concurrent vs. sequential), priority (quantitative- vs. qualitative-dominant), and point of integration. It provides researchers with a structured map to make design decisions explicit, communicate choices transparently, and locate a study within the broader mixed methods typology. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|