ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Asiakirjoihin perustuva ohjelma-arviointi×Sisällönanalyysi – Tekstin ja median systemaattinen koodaus×
TieteenalaKenttämenetelmätLaadulliset menetelmät
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990sSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
KehittäjäDaniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
TyyppiEvaluation research designQualitative / mixed-method research technique
AlkuperäislähdeStufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
Rinnakkaisnimetdocumentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluationİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
Liittyvät65
TiivistelmäDocument-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Document-based Program Evaluation · Content Analysis. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare