ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Digitaalinen autoetnografia×Refleksiivinen temaattinen analyysi×
TieteenalaLaadulliset menetelmätLaadulliset menetelmät
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
KehittäjäAnnette Markham; expanded through netnography work by Robert KozinetsVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TyyppiQualitative self-reflexive designQualitative research method
AlkuperäislähdeMarkham, A. N. (2013). Undermining 'data': A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry. First Monday, 18(10). link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimetonline autoethnography, virtual autoethnography, digital self-ethnography, networked autoethnographyRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Liittyvät56
TiivistelmäDigital autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher systematically examines their own lived experience within digital environments — social media platforms, online communities, gaming worlds, digital workplaces, or other networked spaces — to illuminate broader cultural and social phenomena. Combining autoethnography's first-person reflexivity with the study of digital life, it treats personal digital traces, interactions, and self-representations as primary data.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Digital Autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare