Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Difference-in-Discontinuities -suunnitelma× | Paneeliaineiston kiinteiden vaikutusten malli× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Kausaalipäättely | Ekonometria |
| Menetelmäperhe | Regression model | Regression model |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2016 | 2014 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Grembi, Nannicini & Troiano | Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data |
| Tyyppi≠ | Hybrid quasi-experimental causal design (RDD + DID) | Panel data regression |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Grembi, V., Nannicini, T. & Troiano, U. (2016). Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 1-30. DOI ↗ | Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | diff-in-disc, DiD-RDD, Süreksizliklerde Fark (Difference-in-Discontinuities) | fixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli |
| Liittyvät | 5 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Difference-in-Discontinuities is a hybrid quasi-experimental design that fuses regression discontinuity (RDD) with difference-in-differences (DID), introduced by Grembi, Nannicini and Troiano (2016). It compares the discontinuity at the same cutoff value across two periods to isolate a causal effect. | The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014). |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|