ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Cultural Domain Analysis×Ethnographic Interview×
TieteenalaAnthropologyAnthropology
MenetelmäperheProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Syntyvuosi19941979
KehittäjäStephen P. Borgatti (synthesis of cognitive anthropology methods)James P. Spradley
TyyppiIntegrated framework for eliciting and analyzing cultural domainsStructured developmental sequence of interview questions for eliciting cultural knowledge
AlkuperäislähdeBorgatti, S. P. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(4), 261–278. link ↗Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968
RinnakkaisnimetCDA, Domain Analysis (cognitive anthropology), Cultural Domains Approach, Cognitive Domain AnalysisSpradley Interview, Developmental Research Sequence Interview, Ethnographic Interviewing, Domain Elicitation Interview
Liittyvät43
TiivistelmäCultural domain analysis is the integrated framework in cognitive anthropology for discovering the content and structure of a cultural domain — a coherent set of related items such as illnesses, animals, kin terms, or emotions — as the members of a culture themselves organize it. It chains together elicitation methods (free listing, pile sorting, triad tests) and analytic methods (salience, multidimensional scaling, clustering, consensus analysis) to move from 'what items are in this domain?' to 'how are they organized and how widely is that organization shared?'The ethnographic interview, formalized by James Spradley, is a deliberately staged conversation whose goal is to discover how an insider categorizes and talks about their own cultural world rather than to test the researcher's categories. It proceeds through a developmental research sequence of question types — broad grand-tour questions, fine-grained descriptive questions, structural questions that probe how knowledge is organized, and contrast questions that surface the distinctions informants draw between terms. The point is not a list of facts but a reconstructed map of meanings expressed in the informant's own native terms.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: Cultural Domain Analysis · Ethnographic Interview. Haettu 2026-06-25 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare