Vertaile menetelmiä

	Kriittinen suullinen historia	Critical Narrative Inquiry
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1970s–1990s (critical turn within oral history)	1990s–2000s
Kehittäjä	Alessandro Portelli; also Ronald Grele and the broader oral history movement	Synthesises D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry) with critical theory traditions (Kincheloe, McLaren, hooks)
Tyyppi	Qualitative research design	Critical qualitative research approach
Alkuperäislähde	Portelli, A. (1991). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791405703	Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943999
Rinnakkaisnimet	critical oral inquiry, critical oral testimony research, critical oral narrative research, COH	CNI, critical narrative research, critical narrative analysis, narrative inquiry with critical lens
Liittyvät	5	6
Tiivistelmä	Critical oral history applies a critical theory lens to the collection and analysis of first-person spoken accounts of lived experience. It goes beyond preserving personal memory to interrogate how power, identity, race, class, gender, and structural inequality shape what is remembered, what is silenced, and how stories are told. Originating in the work of Alessandro Portelli and the critical turn in oral history from the 1970s onward, the approach treats oral testimony not simply as evidence of the past but as a site of meaning-making and political contestation.	Critical narrative inquiry is a qualitative research approach that collects and analyses personal stories to expose how social structures, power relations, and systemic inequities shape individual experience. It merges the interpretive richness of narrative inquiry with the emancipatory commitments of critical theory, asking not only what happened in a life but also why — and whose interests are served by dominant stories remaining untold or unquestioned.