Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| CRITIC-M× | Menetelmä täydelliselle konsistenssille× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1995 | 2018 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later | Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Objective weight derivation via correlation and variance | Pairwise priority + consistency constraint LP weighting |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI ↗ | Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 3 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability. | FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|