ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Kompleksinen Proportionaalinen Arviointi×Kriteerivaikutuksen menetys -painotusmenetelmä×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi19962016
KehittäjäZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TyyppiProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
AlkuperäislähdeZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: COPRAS · CILOS. Haettu 2026-06-17 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare