ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Kompleksinen Proportionaalinen Arviointi×Kriteerien korrelaatio ja keskihajonta objektiivinen painotus×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi19962010
KehittäjäZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TyyppiProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
AlkuperäislähdeZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: COPRAS · CCSD. Haettu 2026-06-15 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare