Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Condorcet-menetelmä× | PROMETHEE II× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1900 | 1986 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Marquis de Condorcet | Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Pairwise majority rule — winner beats every other alternative in pairwise contest | Preference function (net flow) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Marquis de Condorcet (1900). Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (1785). Imprimerie Royale, Paris (original 1785) link ↗ | Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | CONDORCET (Condorcet Method — Pairwise majority winner from ranked ballots) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Marquis de Condorcet in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | PROMETHEE (PROMETHEE II — Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|