Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Samanaikainen pragmaattinen monimenetelmäinen× | Samanaikainen transformatiivinen yhdistelmämenetelmä× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Tutkimusasetelma | Tutkimusasetelma |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2000s (formalized ~2007–2009) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark; philosophical grounding by R. Burke Johnson & Anthony Onwuegbuzie | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tyyppi | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Alkuperäislähde | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | concurrent pragmatic design, pragmatic concurrent mixed methods, simultaneous pragmatic mixed methods | concurrent transformative design, simultaneous transformative mixed methods, parallel transformative design, transformative concurrent design |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Concurrent pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously within a pragmatic philosophical framework. Rather than privileging either positivism or constructivism, the pragmatic stance selects methods based on what best answers the research question. Both data strands are gathered in parallel, then merged at the interpretation stage to provide a fuller picture than either strand alone could yield. | Concurrent transformative mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, guided by a transformative theoretical lens — such as feminist, critical race, disability, or indigenous frameworks — that foregrounds equity, power, and social change. The design gives either strand equal or unequal priority, but both strands are explicitly shaped by the transformative worldview. Findings are merged or compared to generate actionable insights that advocate for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|