Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Vertaisarvioitu Straussiaaninen maadoitettu teoria× | Vertaisaineistotutkimus× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/1998 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Strauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian) | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|