Vertaile menetelmiä

	Vertaisperusteltu teoria	Vertaileva temaattinen analyysi – Ryhmien välinen temaattinen analyysi
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward	2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)
Kehittäjä	Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars	Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions
Tyyppi	Qualitative comparative research design	Qualitative comparative analytical strategy
Alkuperäislähde	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Rinnakkaisnimet	cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis	cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies.	Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.