Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Vertaisperusteltu teoria× | Vertaisvertaileva etnografia× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadulliset menetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Tyyppi | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Liittyvät | 6 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|