Vertaile menetelmiä

	Vertaisrakentava maadoitettu teoria	Konstruktivistinen ankkuroitu teoria – Charmaz
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014)	2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
Kehittäjä	Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature	Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
Tyyppi	Qualitative comparative research design	Qualitative research method
Alkuperäislähde	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Rinnakkaisnimet	Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory	CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data.	Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.