Vertaile menetelmiä

	Vertaileva klassinen "grounded theory"	Vertaisarvioitu Straussiaaninen maadoitettu teoria
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s	1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/1998
Kehittäjä	Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser	Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967)
Tyyppi	Qualitative theory-building design	Qualitative comparative research design
Alkuperäislähde	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607	Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408
Rinnakkaisnimet	Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory	Strauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian)
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions.	Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions.