Vertaile menetelmiä

	Vertaisautoetnografia	Autoetnografia – henkilökohtainen narratiivinen tutkimus
Tieteenala	Laadulliset menetelmät	Laadulliset menetelmät
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013	Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s)
Kehittäjä	Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez	Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979
Tyyppi	Qualitative research design	Qualitative research method
Alkuperäislähde	Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948	Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947
Rinnakkaisnimet	collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE	auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography
Liittyvät	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.	Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly.