Vertaile menetelmiä

	Koodikattavuusanalyysi	Defect Prediction Model
Tieteenala	Ohjelmistotekniikka	Ohjelmistotekniikka
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	1988	2005
Kehittäjä	Test Coverage Community	Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Tyyppi	measurement and analysis	machine learning model
Alkuperäislähde	Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997). Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 29(4), 366–427.	Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355.
Rinnakkaisnimet	coverage metrics, test coverage, instrumentation-based measurement	fault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Liittyvät	4	4
Tiivistelmä	Code coverage analysis measures the extent to which source code is executed by a test suite, quantifying which lines, branches, or paths are exercised. Tools instrument code to track execution, reporting coverage percentages and identifying untested regions. Coverage analysis guides test creation, detects dead code, and validates test adequacy in quality assurance processes.	Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.