Vertaile menetelmiä

	Co-Production Analysis	Sociotechnical Imaginaries Analysis
Tieteenala	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
Menetelmäperhe	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Syntyvuosi	2004	2009
Kehittäjä	Sheila Jasanoff	Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim
Tyyppi	Interpretive analytic framework (idiom) in science and technology studies	Qualitative interpretive and comparative method
Alkuperäislähde	Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415403290	Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119-146.
Rinnakkaisnimet	Co-production idiom, Co-productionist analysis, Knowledge and social order analysis	Sociotechnical imaginary analysis, Imaginaries of science and technology, Visions of desirable futures analysis
Liittyvät	4	4
Tiivistelmä	Co-production analysis applies the 'idiom of co-production' developed by Sheila Jasanoff: the claim that the ways we know the world are inseparable from the ways we choose to live in it. Scientific knowledge and social order are not produced in separate spheres that later interact; they are produced together. Co-production analysis traces this simultaneous making of natural and social facts—how a new way of knowing nature is bound up with new identities, institutions, discourses, and representations that together stabilise both knowledge and political order.	Sociotechnical imaginaries analysis studies the collectively held, institutionally stabilised, and publicly performed visions of desirable futures that societies attach to science and technology. Introduced by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim in their 2009 comparison of nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, the concept treats imaginaries as more than rhetoric: they are co-produced with the material and political order, shaping how technologies are designed, governed, and lived. The method reconstructs these visions from public discourse, traces how they become embedded in institutions and policy, and compares how the same technology animates different imaginaries across nations or eras.