ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Kriteeri-vaikutuksen mittausjärjestelmä×Vaihtoehtojen järjestysmenetelmä, jossa huomioidaan kaksivaiheinen normalisointi×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi20252022
KehittäjäBošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TyyppiImpact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
AlkuperäislähdeBošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäCIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: CIMAS · AROMAN. Haettu 2026-06-17 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare