Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Tapaustutkimus× | Dokumenttianalyysi× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Laadulliset menetelmät | Laadullinen tutkimus |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1984 (seminal codification) | 1920 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| Tyyppi≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|