Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Bifaktorimalli (yleiset ja spesifit tekijät)× | Rakenteellinen yhtälömallinnus (SEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala≠ | Psykometriikka | Tilastotiede |
| Menetelmäperhe | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1937 | 1970 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Holzinger & Swineford (1937); modern revival by Reise (2012) | Karl Jöreskog (LISREL framework, 1970s) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Confirmatory latent variable model | Latent variable / causal modeling |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Reise, S. P. (2012). The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. DOI ↗ | Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1473756540 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | Bifaktör Modeli — Genel ve Spesifik Faktörler, hierarchical factor model, general-specific factor model, Schmid-Leiman model | Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (SEM), structural equation modelling, covariance structure analysis, latent variable modeling |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The bifactor measurement model specifies that every indicator loads simultaneously on a single general factor and on one of several specific (group) factors. Formally introduced by Holzinger and Swineford in 1937 and brought into mainstream psychometrics by Reise (2012), it is now the standard tool for evaluating whether a multidimensional scale can legitimately yield a single composite score. | Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical framework that simultaneously estimates a measurement model — relating observed indicators to latent constructs — and a structural model specifying directional or reciprocal relationships among those constructs. Rooted in the LISREL tradition developed by Karl Jöreskog in the 1970s, SEM is the standard tool for testing complex theoretical models in the social, behavioural, and management sciences. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|