ScholarGate
Avustaja

Vertaile menetelmiä

Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.

Bipolar-laajennus TOPSIS-menetelmästä×Kriteeri-vaikutuksen mittausjärjestelmä×
TieteenalaPäätöksentekoPäätöksenteko
MenetelmäperheMCDMMCDM
Syntyvuosi19812025
KehittäjäHwang & YoonBošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TyyppiBipolar outranking/ranking — Bipolar Fuzzy Set (BFS: positive membership μ⁺ ∈ [0,1], negative μ⁻ ∈ [-1,0])Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
AlkuperäislähdeAlghamdi, M. A., Alshehri, N. O., Akram, M. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Rinnakkaisnimet
Liittyvät88
TiivistelmäBF-TOPSIS (Bipolar extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hwang & Yoon in 1981. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAineisto
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Lähteet
  3. PUBLISHED

Siirry hakuun Lataa diat

ScholarGateVertaile menetelmiä: BF-TOPSIS · CIMAS. Haettu 2026-06-18 osoitteesta https://scholargate.app/fi/compare