Vertaile menetelmiä

	Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating)	Boosting	Robust Boosting
Tieteenala	Koneoppiminen	Koneoppiminen	Koneoppiminen
Menetelmäperhe	Machine learning	Machine learning	Machine learning
Syntyvuosi	1996	1990–1997	1999–2001
Kehittäjä	Breiman, L.	Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.	Freund, Y.; Mason, L. et al.
Tyyppi	Ensemble meta-algorithm (variance reduction via bootstrap aggregation)	Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting)	Ensemble (robust sequential boosting)
Alkuperäislähde	Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140.	Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.	Freund, Y. (2001). An adaptive version of the boost by majority algorithm. Machine Learning, 43(3), 293–318.
Rinnakkaisnimet	Bootstrap Aggregating, bootstrap aggregation, bagged ensemble, bagged predictor	AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble	noise-tolerant boosting, robust AdaBoost, boosting with robust losses, outlier-resistant boosting
Liittyvät	5	6	6
Tiivistelmä	Bagging, short for Bootstrap Aggregating, is an ensemble meta-algorithm introduced by Leo Breiman in 1996 that trains multiple copies of a base learner on independently drawn bootstrap samples of the training data and combines their predictions — by averaging for regression or majority vote for classification — to produce a final predictor with substantially lower variance than any single base learner.	Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy.	Robust Boosting modifies standard boosting algorithms — such as AdaBoost or gradient boosting — by replacing the default exponential or squared loss with robust loss functions (e.g., Huber, logistic, or truncated losses) or by incorporating noise-tolerance mechanisms, so that the ensemble remains accurate even when training data contain outliers, label noise, or heavy-tailed errors.