Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Arkeologinen stratigrafia× | Hermeneuttinen analyysi – Tekstien tulkitseva ymmärtäminen× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Kenttämenetelmät | Kenttämenetelmät |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | Formalized 1973–1979 (Harris Matrix); geological principle applied to archaeology from mid-19th century | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Edward C. Harris (Harris Matrix formalization); William Smith (geological law of superposition applied to archaeology, 19th c.) | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Tyyppi≠ | Field excavation and sequence recording method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Harris, E. C. (1979). Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0123264220 | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | stratigraphic excavation, Harris matrix method, stratigraphic sequence analysis, layer-by-layer excavation | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Liittyvät≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | Archaeological stratigraphy is the systematic excavation and recording of soil layers, deposits, and features at an archaeological site in order to establish the relative chronological sequence of human activity. Grounded in the geological law of superposition — that lower layers are older than those above — it uses the Harris Matrix as a formal tool to map depositional relationships and reconstruct site history layer by layer. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|