Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Additiivinen suhdearviointi× | ANP× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 2010 | 1996 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tyyppi≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät | 8 | 8 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|