Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Analytic Hierarchy Process× | Condorcet-menetelmä× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Päätöksenteko | Päätöksenteko |
| Menetelmäperhe | MCDM | MCDM |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1980 | 1900 |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Marquis de Condorcet |
| Tyyppi≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise majority rule — winner beats every other alternative in pairwise contest |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Marquis de Condorcet (1900). Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (1785). Imprimerie Royale, Paris (original 1785) link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet | — | — |
| Liittyvät≠ | 8 | 5 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CONDORCET (Condorcet Method — Pairwise majority winner from ranked ballots) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Marquis de Condorcet in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|