Vertaile menetelmiä
Tarkastele valitsemiasi menetelmiä rinnakkain; eroavat rivit korostetaan.
| Mukautuva AB-asetelma× | AB-asetelma× | ABA-asetelma – ABA-kääntöasetelma× | ABAB-asetelma× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tieteenala | Koesuunnittelu | Koesuunnittelu | Koesuunnittelu | Koesuunnittelu |
| Menetelmäperhe | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Syntyvuosi≠ | 1968 (AB foundation); 2000s (adaptive extensions) | 1960s | 1968 | 1960s (Sidman 1960; Baer et al. 1968) |
| Kehittäjä≠ | Baer, Wolf & Risley (AB foundation); Kratochwill & Levin (adaptive single-case extensions) | Murray Sidman; Baer, Wolf & Risley | Montrose Wolf, Donald Baer, Todd Risley (applied behavior analysis tradition) | Murray Sidman; Baer, Wolf & Risley (applied behavior analysis formalization) |
| Tyyppi≠ | Single-subject experimental design with adaptive phase-change rules | Single-subject experimental design | Single-subject experimental design | Single-subject experimental design |
| Alkuperäislähde≠ | Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91-97. DOI ↗ | Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology. Basic Books. link ↗ | Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗ | Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology. Basic Books. link ↗ |
| Rinnakkaisnimet≠ | adaptive single-case AB design, data-driven AB design, adaptive baseline-intervention design, adaptive AB phase design | baseline-intervention design, AB single-case design, AB phase design | reversal design, withdrawal design, ABA withdrawal design | reversal design, withdrawal design, ABAB reversal, operant reversal design |
| Liittyvät≠ | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Tiivistelmä≠ | The adaptive AB design is a single-subject experimental design that retains the two-phase baseline-then-intervention structure of the classic AB design but replaces fixed session-count rules with pre-specified data-driven criteria — such as stability thresholds or trend benchmarks — that determine when to transition between phases. This adaptive logic allows the phase boundary to move in response to the individual participant's actual performance trajectory rather than a predetermined schedule. | The AB design is the simplest single-subject experimental design, consisting of two sequential phases: a baseline phase (A) in which the target behavior is observed under natural conditions without intervention, followed by an intervention phase (B) in which the treatment or manipulation is introduced. Changes in the behavior's level, trend, or variability between phases are used to infer the effect of the intervention on the individual participant. | The ABA design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates experimental control through three sequential phases: a baseline phase (A1), an intervention phase (B), and a return-to-baseline withdrawal phase (A2). By removing the intervention in the final phase and observing whether behavior reverts toward baseline levels, researchers establish a functional relationship between the treatment and the target behavior for an individual participant. | The ABAB design is a single-subject experimental methodology that establishes causal control by repeatedly introducing and removing an intervention. A baseline phase (A) is followed by an intervention phase (B), then a return to baseline (A), and a second intervention phase (B), allowing the researcher to demonstrate that observed behavior changes are produced by the intervention rather than by coincidental factors. |
| ScholarGateAineisto ↗ |
|
|
|
|