Type an exact method name, a misspelling, an acronym, or a description of what you are trying to do. The index is built for all four.
One thing, deeply: method pages. Names, full names, known aliases and the text of the page itself are all indexed, one row per method per language. Each of those parts carries its own weight, so a name match outranks a mention buried in the body.
That focus is what keeps the ranking honest. Search is not a web search that happens to know some methods; it is a catalog index that knows exactly what a method page contains.

Exact matches rank first. When full text search returns nothing at all, the query falls through to trigram matching, so a mistyped name still lands. The result then carries a fuzzy label, and a hit found by meaning carries a related one, so you always know which door you came in through.
Acronyms expand from a curated list, and only where the expansion is unambiguous. Accents are folded, so a term typed without its diacritics finds the same page.

The fallbacks above are not separate modes you switch between. They run on the same query, in order, and the result tells you which one found it.
Filters and sorts act on the result set, and none of them drop a method quietly. When a list comes back empty, the page says which kind of empty it is.
Search is the front door, not the destination. The route from a half remembered name to an answer you can cite runs in three steps.
If you would rather wander than search, the atlas maps fields and families, and browse walks the catalog family by family. Open the atlas, Browse the catalog.
Methods. The index holds one row per method page per language, with names, aliases and page text. Papers appear inside method pages, as the open records those pages were built from.
No. Search and method pages are public. An account is needed only for the parts that write something down, such as a bookshelf, or that run provider work, such as the Library assistant.
For a curated set of unambiguous acronyms, yes: the query quietly expands to the full name as well. Ambiguous ones are left out on purpose, because expanding those would bury the reading you actually meant.
The page says so, and says which kind of nothing it is: no method matched the words, no method survived the filters currently on, or the index is not reachable. Browse suggestions appear instead of a blank screen.
The interface reads in 46 languages and the index is stored per language, so results come back in the one you are using. Accent folding means a term typed plainly still matches.
The index is built for the version you actually type, not the tidy one you would look up afterwards.
Open search