ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

Uses and Gratifications Survey×تحلیل تعیین دستور کار (Agenda-Setting Analysis)×
حوزهCommunicationمطالعات رسانه
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش19731972
پدیدآورElihu Katz, Jay Blumler & Michael GurevitchMaxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw
نوعAudience-centered survey approach to media motivations and rewardsEmpirical method for studying how media coverage affects issue salience and public concern
منبع بنیادینKatz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. DOI ↗McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرU&G survey, Gratifications sought and obtained survey, Media gratifications measurement, Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Anketiagenda-setting theory, media agenda analysis, issue salience
مرتبط45
خلاصهThe uses and gratifications survey is the dominant audience-centered method in communication research, asking not what media do to people but what people do with media. Codified by Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch in 1973, it treats audiences as active agents who select media to satisfy social and psychological needs, and it measures those motives and the rewards obtained through structured self-report scales.Agenda-Setting Analysis is an empirical method for investigating the influence of media coverage on what issues the public considers important. Developed by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw (1972), the approach tests a core hypothesis about media effects: media coverage does not tell people what to think, but rather what to think about. By comparing the issues receiving media coverage with the issues the public identifies as important, researchers measure agenda-setting effects—the degree to which media attention predicts public concern. The method demonstrates media's power to structure the hierarchy of issues, even when media may not directly persuade on specific issues.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Uses and Gratifications Survey · Agenda-Setting Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-25 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare