ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

امگای مک‌دونالد فرم کوتاه×تحلیل پایایی فرم کوتاه×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش1999 (omega); short-form application 1990s–2000s1990s–2000s
پدیدآورRoderick P. McDonald (omega); short-form application systematised across psychometric literatureConventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002)
نوعReliability coefficient for abbreviated scalesScale development / psychometric evaluation
منبع بنیادینMcDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805830750Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرomega for abbreviated scales, short-scale omega, omega-total short form, abbreviated scale reliabilityabbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliability
مرتبط46
خلاصهShort-form McDonald's omega applies the omega reliability coefficient to abbreviated or shortened versions of psychological scales. It provides a theoretically sound reliability estimate that accounts for the multidimensional structure of the short instrument, enabling researchers to evaluate whether abbreviation has preserved the reliability of the original full-length scale.Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Short-form McDonald's omega · Short-form reliability analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-19 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare