مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| دفترچه یادداشت پژوهش× | تحلیل مضمون بازتابی× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | روششناسی پیمایش | کیفی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| نوع≠ | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool | Qualitative research method |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| مرتبط | 6 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|