ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مقیاس اثربخشی سیاسی×مقیاس مشارکت سیاسی×مقیاس اعتماد سیاسی×
حوزهروان‌شناسی سیاسیروان‌شناسی سیاسیروان‌شناسی سیاسی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش196919951974
پدیدآورRichard Niemi, Steven Craig, Albert BanduraSidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry BradyArthur H. Miller
نوعSelf-reportSelf-reportSelf-report
منبع بنیادینNiemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407-1413. DOI ↗Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. link ↗Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرPolitical Efficacy, Internal Efficacy, External EfficacyPPCS, Civic Participation Measure, Political Activity ScalePTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust Module
مرتبط333
خلاصهPolitical efficacy measures sense of personal agency and power in the political system, encompassing both internal efficacy (belief in own political competence and understanding) and external efficacy (belief that the political system is responsive to citizen input). Rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory (1977) and developed for political contexts by Niemi, Craig, and colleagues (1969 onwards), the measure explains why some citizens feel empowered to engage in politics while others feel powerless. High-efficacy citizens are substantially more likely to participate, contact representatives, and vote; low-efficacy citizens withdraw from politics and are susceptible to anti-democratic appeals.The Political Participation Scale measures engagement in civic and political activities, encompassing voting, campaign involvement, contacting officials, organizational membership, community volunteering, and protest activity. Developed by Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995), the measure captures both conventional participation (voting, contacting representatives) and unconventional participation (protest, civil disobedience). It addresses fundamental questions in political science: Why do some citizens engage while others withdraw? How do structural resources (time, money, education) and psychological factors (efficacy, interest) drive participation?The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Political Efficacy Scale · Political Participation Scale · Political Trust Scale. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-20 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare