مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

	مطالعه موردی چندگانه مشارکتی	طراحی مطالعه موردی چندگانه
حوزه	کیفی	کیفی
خانواده	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
سال پیدایش	1980s–1990s (convergence of case study methodology and participatory research traditions)	1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
پدیدآور	Robert K. Yin (multiple case study logic); Kurt Lewin and subsequent PAR scholars (participatory framework)	Robert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
نوع	Qualitative research design	Qualitative research method
منبع بنیادین	Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169	Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
نام‌های دیگر	participatory multi-case study, collaborative multiple case study, PMCS, participatory comparative case research	comparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
مرتبط	5	6
خلاصه	Participatory multiple case study research integrates the structured logic of multiple case study design — examining two or more bounded cases to build analytic generalisations — with the collaborative ethics of participatory research, where community members or practitioners co-design the inquiry, co-collect data, and co-interpret findings. The approach combines Yin's replication logic across cases with the emancipatory and co-ownership principles that define participatory action research traditions.	Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.