ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

Outcome Mapping×Contribution Analysis×
حوزهPublic PolicyPublic Policy
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش20012001
پدیدآورSarah Earl, Fred Carden & Terry Smutylo (IDRC)John Mayne
نوعActor-centred planning, monitoring and evaluation approachTheory-based approach to causal inference about contribution
منبع بنیادینEarl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC). ISBN: 9780889369597Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرOM, IDRC Outcome Mapping, Behavioural Change MappingMayne's Contribution Analysis, Contribution Story Analysis, Theory-Based Contribution Analysis
مرتبط43
خلاصهOutcome Mapping is a planning, monitoring and evaluation methodology developed by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and set out by Sarah Earl, Fred Carden and Terry Smutylo in 2001. It redefines results as changes in the behaviour, relationships, activities and actions of the people and organisations a program works with directly — its 'boundary partners' — rather than as downstream development impacts. By focusing on the behavioural changes a program can plausibly influence, Outcome Mapping addresses the attribution problem head-on and shifts evaluation toward learning and contribution.Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 1 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Outcome Mapping · Contribution Analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-24 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare