ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

اعتبار سنجی نومولوژیک ترتیبی×تحلیل عاملی تأییدی (CFA)×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش1955 (concept); ordinal application 1990s–present1969
پدیدآورCronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); ordinal extension in modern psychometricsKarl Gustav Jöreskog
نوعValidity assessmentHypothesis-testing latent variable model
منبع بنیادینCronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرnomological validity for ordinal data, ordinal nomological network, construct network validity (ordinal), ordinal criterion-related validityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
مرتبط54
خلاصهOrdinal nomological validity examines whether a construct measured with ordinal items (e.g., Likert-type scales) behaves in theoretically predicted ways within a nomological network — a web of expected relationships with other constructs and criteria — using methods suited to ordinal data rather than assuming continuous measurement.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Ordinal Nomological Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare