ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

اعتبار سنجی نومولوژیکی (Nomological Validity)×اعتبار تمایز×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش19551959
پدیدآورLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
نوعValidity evidence frameworkValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
منبع بنیادینCronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرnomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validitydiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
مرتبط65
خلاصهNomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Nomological Validity · Discriminant Validity. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare