مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| اعتبار سنجی نومولوژیکی (Nomological Validity)× | روایی محتوا× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | روانسنجی | روانسنجی |
| خانواده | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1955 | 1975 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement |
| نوع≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation |
| مرتبط | 6 | 6 |
| خلاصه≠ | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|