مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

	Network Text Analysis	Semantic Network Analysis
حوزه	Communication	Communication
خانواده	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
سال پیدایش	2002	1999
پدیدآور	Corman et al. (centering resonance analysis); network text tradition	George Barnett, Marya Doerfel, Steven Corman (communication applications)
نوع	Representation and analysis of text as networks of linked concepts	Network representation of concepts and their co-occurrence in text
منبع بنیادین	Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., McPhee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 157–206.	Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., McPhee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002). Studying complex discursive systems: Centering resonance analysis of communication. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 157–206.
نام‌های دیگر	Text network analysis, Centering resonance analysis, Concept network analysis, Ağ Tabanlı Metin Analizi	Text network analysis, Concept co-occurrence network analysis, Centering resonance analysis, Anlamsal Ağ Analizi
مرتبط	4	4
خلاصه	Network text analysis represents the content of text not as counts of words or topics but as a network of concepts linked by their relationships, then applies social-network methods to reveal which ideas are central and how they connect. Centering resonance analysis (CRA), introduced by Corman and colleagues in 2002, is a leading variant that builds concept networks from the noun phrases that structure discourse.	Semantic network analysis represents the meaning of a text or corpus as a network of concepts connected by their co-occurrence or grammatical proximity, then uses network-analytic measures to reveal which ideas are central, how concepts cluster, and how shared meaning is structured. In communication research it is the standard way to map the conceptual architecture of media coverage, organizational discourse, and public conversation at scale.