ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

مرور نگاشت مبتنی بر شبکه×مرور نگاشت×
حوزهعلم‌سنجیعلم‌سنجی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش2000s–2010sLate 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s
پدیدآورPetticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis traditionBuckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence)
نوعEvidence synthesis method with network analysis overlaySystematic evidence mapping methodology
منبع بنیادینPetticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرnetwork mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping reviewevidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map
مرتبط66
خلاصهA network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base.A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Network-based Mapping review · Mapping Review. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare