مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| تحلیل استعاری چند موردی× | تحلیل گفتمان× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه≠ | کیفی | پژوهش کیفی |
| خانواده | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| پدیدآور≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| نوع≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| مرتبط≠ | 6 | 2 |
| خلاصه≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|