ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

نظریه داده‌بنیاد سازه‌انگارانه چند موردی×نظریه داده‌بنیاد سازه‌انگارانه×
حوزهکیفیکیفی
خانوادهProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سال پیدایش2006 (Charmaz's CGT); multi-case applications prominent from 2010s onward2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
پدیدآورKathy Charmaz (constructivist grounded theory); multi-case extension developed through methodological elaboration by Charmaz and subsequent scholarsKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
نوعQualitative research design and analytic approachQualitative research method
منبع بنیادینCharmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
نام‌های دیگرmulti-case CGT, constructivist grounded theory with multiple cases, multiple-site constructivist GT, CGT multiple case designCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
مرتبط66
خلاصهMultiple case-based constructivist grounded theory (CGT) combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory framework with a deliberate multi-case design. The researcher collects and analyzes data from two or more purposively selected cases simultaneously, applying iterative coding, constant comparison, and theoretical sampling across cases to build a grounded theory that accounts for both within-case depth and cross-case variation. The resulting theory is understood as jointly constructed by researcher and participants rather than objectively discovered.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Multiple Case-Based Constructivist Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-15 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare