مقایسهٔ روشها
روشهای انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیفهای متفاوت برجسته شدهاند.
| قابلیت اطمینان آزمون-بازآزمون چندسطحی× | تحلیل عاملی تأییدی (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| حوزه | روانسنجی | روانسنجی |
| خانواده | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| سال پیدایش≠ | 1979 (ICC foundation); multilevel extension: 1990s–2000s | 1969 |
| پدیدآور≠ | Shrout & Fleiss (ICC foundation); multilevel extension by Goldstein, Snijders, and others | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| نوع≠ | Reliability estimation under hierarchical data | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| منبع بنیادین≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| نامهای دیگر | hierarchical test-retest reliability, multilevel ICC reliability, nested test-retest reliability, ML-TRT reliability | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| مرتبط≠ | 5 | 4 |
| خلاصه≠ | Multilevel test-retest reliability estimates how consistently a measurement instrument produces the same scores across repeated administrations when observations are nested within higher-level units — such as patients within clinics or students within classrooms. It partitions total score variance across levels using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from multilevel models. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateمجموعهداده ↗ |
|
|