ScholarGate
دستیار

مقایسهٔ روش‌ها

روش‌های انتخابی خود را کنار هم مرور کنید؛ ردیف‌های متفاوت برجسته شده‌اند.

تحلیل گویه چندگروهی×تحلیل عاملی تأییدی چندگروهی (MG-CFA)×
حوزهروان‌سنجیروان‌سنجی
خانوادهLatent structureLatent structure
سال پیدایش19861971
پدیدآورClassical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986)Karl Jöreskog
نوعComparative item-level analysisMeasurement model / invariance test
منبع بنیادینCrocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
نام‌های دیگرMGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysisMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
مرتبط66
خلاصهMulti-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateمجموعه‌داده
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 منابع
  3. PUBLISHED

رفتن به جست‌وجو دریافت اسلایدها

ScholarGateمقایسهٔ روش‌ها: Multi-group item analysis · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. بازیابی‌شده در 2026-06-17 از https://scholargate.app/fa/compare